Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected
| PentecostalTheology.com
God inspired his name in the OT with nearly 6800 spots. Why? Because God wants it there. As well OT is quoted in the NT over 200 times where the name belongs in the OT. Why was it removed? Wicked men who feared taking God’s name in vain removed it. Only the wicked fear taking God’s name in vain, the Righteous love the name and use it. Removed by Satan’s will to mislead. I believe the wicked in God’s view keep the name out of God’s bible. Here is the prime example of the misleading that it does
Joel 2:31-32
Those who call on the name of YHWH (Jehovah) will be saved.
Quoted twice in the NT, Acts 2:21 and Romans 10:13. But since altered translations by Satan’s will have LORD at Joel, Lord is found in both NT spots as well. And since 1 Cor 8:6 says "Jesus is Lord" those calling on the name Jesus to be saved are being misled into not doing God’s will found in Joel.
Why do you think so many religions claiming to be Christian outright refuse to support God’s will and his name over Satan’s will?
Anonymous
Why are things from an anti-Christian cult being posted here!
Anonymous
Philip Williams it is a JW heresy in NWT sectarian perversion.
Kurios is the Holy Spirit Greek inspired word, not YHWH it replaces.
Anonymous
Philip Williams Can you expand on your comment here? The statement is broad and does not highlight your concerns to the reader.
Anonymous
Billy Meacham this writer denies that Jesus is Lord. Not only is that not Christian. It’s anti-Christian! Why is such as that allowed in a Christian forum?
Anonymous
Philip Williams how would you know any of these theologies?
Anonymous
Troy Day maybe due to studying historical theology and theological movements.
Anonymous
from what you said about historical theology and theological history you are @ a sub zero level below any of my HT101 students. I recommend you take some courses soon – there are free audits for seniors offered
Anonymous
Billy Meacham Can you too expand on your comment- The statement is broad and what sparked your interest in this topic for starters?
Anonymous
It wasn’t, but only the well-informed and knowledgeable know that.
Anonymous
Evelyn Gardiner only the well-informed and knowledgeable know that is TRUE Now why would Philip Williams do not know any of these is another story
Anonymous
That’s why I like the Legacy Standard Bible…the Old Testament, at least.
Yisroel Meir
Hi everyone I’m an Orthodox Jewish Yeshiva grad .In Orthodoxy the received concept from the Torah is that we use Hashem and Adonai in prayer and reading the Torah .I’m in New York and have met various Oneness, Trinitarian, Holiness people that the people were quite identifiable by their dress code.We do not proselytize so no worries .Thanks for the information.
Anonymous
I think you’re speaking about Matthew chapter 28:19 will it speaks baptizing them in the name of the father and of the son and of the holy Ghost which I do believe that that’s scripture was changed I do believe that the original speaks of being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins I’m not sure how it was written I’m just stating paraphrasing as close as I can get it but I do believe that that scripture was actually before was changed to father son the holy Ghost did say in the name of Jesus or something to that effect
Anonymous
James Martin why would you say or think that when it reads: Joel 2:31-32
Those who call on the name of YHWH (Jehovah) will be saved.
Quoted twice in the NT, Acts 2:21 and Romans 10:13
Anonymous
Troy DayI’m saying that because I don’t believe that the trinitarian phrase existed in the older Bible I don’t believe it was originally Father son and holy Ghost in that verse and some researchers have thought the same that it was religiously spoken of remission of sins being spoken of in the name of Jesus Christ not father son and holy Ghost because of the fact there is no Trinity in the scriptures
Anonymous
James Martin There’s nothing wrong with thinking. We all do, but all our thinking is not well founded. You continue your research might read Tertullian against Praxis helping
Anonymous
Evelyn Gardinerfirst of all Evelyn the whole reason for this statement is because the scripture is not based on Trinity that particular scripture Matthew chapter 2819 is a trinitarian verse so I’m sure that anyone that teaches oneness would agree as to how does a trinitarian scripture get into a Bible that is a oneness Bible there was never any such thing as three gods or any type of Trinity so that’s what the statement means when I’m saying I’m not sure because I don’t see how it got in there
Anonymous
James Martin which trinitarian phrase existed in the older Bible ?
Anonymous
Troy Daywhat I meant by that was older translations there are some translations that are older than the translations we see today in the Bible but there was never been Trinity in the Bible
Anonymous
Whoever wrote this is manifestly neither Pentecostal, Christian, nor scholar.
Anonymous
Philip Warstler when you said about the text Dan Anthony Ricky Grimsley not liking the church fathers ONE little bit and Brett Dobbs not reading them in the original Gary Micheal Epping John Mushenhouse once supposed to suggest here
Whoever wrote this is manifestly neither Pentecostal, Christian, nor scholar.
how would you know this @ level subzero? Philip Williams Isara Mo
Anonymous
Troy Day one who denies the name of Jesus is no Christian!
Anonymous
Philip Williams WHO here denies the name of Jesus as no Christian?
Anonymous
Troy Day whoever wrote that piece which you posted here rejects the name of Jesus, the point made in this post.
Anonymous
Philip Williams as I told Duane L Burgess The mistake of the ASB was to make a proper name form YHWH, Jehovah. The WEB and the LEX made the same mistake by using Yahweh, a made up name https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMU9cBhayUI
Anonymous
Troy Day does it matter if the church fathers are read in the original languages or not?
Anonymous
Brett Dobbs of course – imagine if your translator was catholic or Satanist like Philip Williams has pointed out before – what are you reading then?
Anonymous
Troy Day they read the Greek with the same eisegesis as they read the English.
Anonymous
Troy Day good point, that’s the reason why I prefer KJV over other translations. KJV translators were very godly men.
But godly men is only one of my standards for bible translations, when it comes to old church writings, I want someone who isn’t biased on proving a certain doctrine, I just want someone who is fair to translate the Latin or Greek to the closest English equivalent as possible.
The English version of Irenaeus against heresies that I have has passed all my critiques. 
When it comes to those early writings; I’m going to look at who translated it, find out what I can about them. Maybe compare some other versions and then move on. There’s no point in my opinion in learning Greek to examine their work. If I felt the need to do that, then I would just spend the next 5 to 10 years getting fluent in Greek and then translate it myself. I neither have the time or passion or being lead by the Holy Spirit to do that. So I’m simply going to find a version and settle with it.
Anonymous
Brett Dobbs the preserved writings of most of those fathers were edited to conform to later teachings.
Anonymous
The new Legacy Standard Bible translation returns to focusing on the integrity of the text.
For example, God’s name is faithfully translated as, “Yahweh.” Doulos is correctly translated as “slave.”
https://read.lsbible.org/?q=yahweh
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess The mistake of the ASB was to make a proper name form YHWH, Jehovah. The WEB and the LEX made the same mistake by using Yahweh, a made up name https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMU9cBhayUI
Anonymous
God manifested Himself to Moses. It was YHWH. Jehovah originated from an attempt to prono6ncr the consonants with the vowels from the word Adonai.
Anonymous
This is a discussion that does not scar the devil or save one soul. Therefore it is as Soloman said, “vanity…chasing after the wind..” As a Pentecostal, I have better use for my time.