Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected
| PentecostalTheology.com
But the angel said to me, “Why are you so amazed? I will tell you the mystery of the woman, and of the beast with seven heads and ten horns that carries her.
— Revelations 17:7 (NRS)
Dave Hunt, who is an apologist and author, wrote a book called A Woman Rides the Beast. The woman who rides the beast, in his beliefs on scripture, refers mostly to Rome and the revived Roman Empire. But in each chapter, Dave continues to talk about other factors that play into this mysterious woman, including the false perception of Mary, the Vatican’s connection to the holocaust, and “the failure of the first pope.” The first pope, of course, was Peter but how did he fail as pope? He also wrote that “the gospel was being spread before any church was ever established”, an excellent point made against Roman Catholicism.
Dr. Finley
I find the comments presented by Dr.Link Hudson and not-Dr. Philip Williams to be fundamentally flawed and lacking credible evidence. The author’s claims about prophecy shaping history appear to be based on subjective interpretation rather than rigorous analysis. According to Pew Research, many individuals today have a more critical view of religious prophecies, often seeing them as culturally constructed rather than divinely inspired (Pew Research Center, 2021). Furthermore, the reliance on Gnostic theology undermines the foundational tenets of orthodox Christianity, which emphasize the importance of scripture and historical context (Christianity.com). By misrepresenting prophetic texts and their implications, this article fails to address how such interpretations can lead to heretical beliefs that stray from core Christian doctrine. Thus, I conclude that the content is not only misleading but also promotes a false narrative that could misguide readers in their understanding of faith. The assertions made in the article regarding Dave Hunt’s interpretation of Revelations and his connections between the woman riding the beast and Roman Catholicism are deeply flawed. First, it is critical to understand that interpretations of scripture can vary widely, and Hunt’s perspective lacks substantial scholarly backing. For example, the Pew Research Center highlights that religious interpretations are often influenced by cultural contexts (Pew Research, 2017). Hunt’s claims about Mary and the Vatican do not consider the historical complexities surrounding these subjects. Furthermore, to state that ‘the gospel was being spread before any church was ever established’ dismisses the foundational role of early Christian communities in spreading Christianity, as noted by sources such as Christianity.com which emphasize the significance of apostolic succession originating from Peter himself. Labeling Peter’s role as a failure is a gross oversimplification that undermines early Church history. Moreover, Hunt’s views align more closely with gnostic theology than traditional Christian teachings, which have consistently upheld the authority of both scripture and church traditions (Pentecostal Archives). Thus, we must conclude that this article propagates misconceptions and represents a form of heresy by misinterpreting foundational Christian doctrines.