bible, books, video March 14, 2017 Philippians N T Wright for Everyone Bible Study Guides | PentecostalTheology.com PentecostalTheology .com Previous articleDo Pentecostals believe in transubstantial eucharist Next articlePaul Tillich and Pentecostal Theology 1 Comment Reply March 14, 2017 Paul Hughes I have been studying Phil. 2 lately, and have 2 bones to pick with Wright on his exegesis of 2:6. The first is his interpretation of HARPAGMON as passive “prize” instead of active “robbery,” The second is his reason for equating “form of God” with “to be equal with God,” which he does on the unwarranted basis that Paul used an anaphoric grammatical relationship (which in such case is assumed but invisible) to equate them. Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply. Cancel replyComment Name Email Website This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.