Is Dr. Brown indeed NAR heresy?

Is Dr. Brown indeed NAR heresy?

Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars

Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected

| PentecostalTheology.com

               

Dr. Michael Brown refers to the New Apostolic Reformation (commonly known by the acronym, NAR) as the “so-called NAR.” As virtually anyone with basic reading comprehension can easily know, NAR exists. It hasn’t been a secret. Although its name has been changed over the years, there is no doubt that the New Apostolic Reformation was and is an organized and relatively open movement in charismatic Christianity. Dr. Brown, who is the lead apologist for the heretical movement, is unique among NAR leaders in that he enjoys close fellowship with non-charismatic evangelical leaders. For the most part, Brown denies that NAR exists or is a strange, convoluted conspiracy theory when in front of non-charismatics, but among NAR audiences, he recognizes its existence and embraces its chief leaders.

For whatever reason, Dr. Brown chose to go on Alisa Childers’ podcast and debate whether or not NAR is a myth with Dr. Doug Geivett and Holly Pivec. Brown, who won’t typically debate any discerning Christians or those who won’t readily embrace him as a solid Christian brother, made the rare decision to interact with Geivett and Pivec, who wrote the book on NAR (literally). Geivett and Pivec’s book, A New Apostolic Reformation? challenges the NAR movement and explains its origins and outworkings in evangelicalism. The two have also written God’s Super-Apostles: Encountering the Worldwide Prophets and Apostle’s Movement.

34 Comments

  • Reply July 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    Duane L Burgess Kyle Williams Philip Williams Steve Miller https://www.pentecostaltheology.com/browns-politicostalism/

  • Reply July 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    Having known the late C Peter Wagner who founded NAR, and how Michael Brown is related to those associated with NAR teaching, i can see the gross ignorance of those making these charges. They invent their enemy.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams oh how mormon of you again
      you did not know C Peter Wagner who founded NAR PER SE
      you knew C Peter Wagner as a salesman trying to sell him some land

      you do not know Michael Brown as related and associated with NAR
      you know Michael Brown as someone you asked about mormons

      so with this trend of name dropping you can tell us
      you know the POPE whom you sold some mormon land
      BUt as far as mormon or NAR theology you say what exactly again?

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Troy Day Peter and I spent some time talking about apostles and prophets, sharing our understanding. Unlike some here, he was a humble man.

      As regards, Michael Brown, his connection to NAR charges is due to his friendship with Rick Joyner, the same as me, though Michael never knew Bob Jones.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams what are you talking about ?
      in his latter days Peter spoke theology ONLY when paid 🙂
      AND about/with apostles and prophets only when paid even more
      what sharing your understanding you could possibly do with Peter

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Troy Day we also talked about that. I was much concerned about holding that South African prophet (since passed) to accountability. Peter was distressed about doing what I suggested.

      Now, I remember. It was Kim Clement who prophesied that bin Ladin would be captured in 3 months. A false prophecy. Peter said that Kim Clement was much to arrogant to receive correction. So might be Troy Day.

  • Reply July 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    Do you have a link to Dr. Browns work on Givett and Pivecs book? I’d love to read it

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Kyle Williams I don’t even know about that. Who is Givett and Pivec?

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams they wrote Counterfeit Kingdom, against the NAR movement

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Kyle Williams don’t waste your tine on invented enemies.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams they’re not invented, unless you buy Dr. Brown’s naivete that the NAR doesn’t exist. False Gospels deceive those who are weak in the faith with underdeveloped spiritual discernment. And for that they are the foremost enemies of Christ and the Church. It’s the entire reason our brethren at Galatia were addressed so sharply by St. Paul.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Kyle Williams how do you mean? Do you have any pro-NAR proof?

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Kyle Williams what is meant by ‘NAR exists!’? C Peter Wagner who coined that word was a real person as we sat and talked. He was a professor trying to understand Pentecostalism. His wife Doris and Chuck Pierce (prophet Windbag) used that for their ministry. They all blundered by anointing Todd Bentley based on Bob Jones’s prophecy. A mess for sure, but not bad men.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Troy Day the Fact that Bethel Redding exists is ample proof. And if you think to your self that they’re “just one local church” look no further than the influence they have over even non Charismatic “worship”.

      Bethel

      Jesus Culture

      Cory Asbury

      Brian and Katie Torwalt

      Leyland

      Cody Carnes

      Dante Bowe

      Steffany Gretzinger

      Elevation Worship

      Jenn Johnson

      + the tens of thousands of quasi- evangelical churches that sing the songs written and produced by this company. Take these things into consideration and I dare say the NAR has its teeth sank so far into American cultural Christianity that it must be tasting blood by now.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams false prophets are not bad men?

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Kyle Williams some are bad men. I wanted C Peter Wagner to understand that. But Peter wasn’t a bad man.

  • Reply July 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    Oscar Valdez Duane L Burgess Peter Vandever Michael Ellis Carter Jr. Gary Micheal Epping Daniel J Hesse Nelson Banuchi For whatever reason, Dr. Brown chose to go on Alisa Childers’ podcast and debate whether or not NAR is a myth with Dr. Doug Geivett and Holly Pivec. Brown, who won’t typically debate any discerning Christians or those who won’t readily embrace him as a solid Christian brother, made the rare decision to interact with Geivett and Pivec, who wrote the book on NAR (literally). Geivett and Pivec’s book, A New Apostolic Reformation? challenges the NAR movement and explains its origins and outworkings in evangelicalism. The two have also written God’s Super-Apostles: Encountering the Worldwide Prophets and Apostle’s Movement. NOW then Philip Williams our Kyle Williams only knew WOF but not NAR … #over

  • Reply July 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    I read where he restricted his use of the term to an organization by that name. There are those using for Charismatics in general.

  • Reply July 13, 2023

    Anonymous

    Dr. Brown is tossed to and fro by every wind of doctrine.
    And the NAR is a false theological system.
    Do not be deceived.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Duane L Burgess are you saying he is NOT NAR anymore? Philip Williams should know way better

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Troy Day NAR isn’t Calvinism. So Duane L Burgess is obviously wrong!

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams Church dropouts
      Why did you stop going to church??

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Troy Day because the bundles of tares will be burned.

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams of course all and while the bundles of wheat will be in the store house – as you know winter wheat is much lighter

    • Reply July 13, 2023

      Anonymous

      Troy Day the Lord, not man, will gather the wheat!

    • Reply July 14, 2023

      Anonymous

      Philip Williams not sure that even John Mushenhouse would know this

  • Reply July 14, 2023

    Anonymous

    Philip Williams not sure that even John Mushenhouse would know this one

  • Reply January 4, 2024

    Anonymous

    Dr Michael Brown definitely has theological problems. Most notably, he denies divine sovereign grace.

    • Reply January 5, 2024

      Anonymous

      Duane L Burgess very few in this group believe John Macs theory which is basically NOT biblical I dont see even Kyle Williams agreeing much with John nonetheless Gary Micheal Epping Philip Williams and Link Hudson nor pre-tribbers Neil Steven Lawrence John Mushenhouse Darnell Henson Jr. Jerome Herrick Weymouth

    • Reply January 6, 2024

      Anonymous

      Jerome Herrick Weymouth I would just state for the sake of Philip Williams that MBrown is NOT quite the opposite

  • Reply January 4, 2024

    Anonymous

    He definitely has some favorites in that group, of whom he does not speak or criticize biblically or theologically.

    • Reply January 4, 2024

      Anonymous

      Oscar Valdez how do you mean this basically
      Gary Micheal Epping sat under him and saw no such things

    • Reply January 4, 2024

      Anonymous

      Troy Day Do your homework!

    • Reply January 5, 2024

      Anonymous

      Duane L Burgess which homework would you believe I have not done Have you read ALL my talks about Brown with Philip Williams in this group alone? Have you done your homework before placing blame again ?

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.