Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
| PentecostalTheology.com
1 Corinthians 12 (ESV):
9 to another faith by the same Spirit, to another gifts of healing by the one Spirit,
27 Now you are the body of Christ and individually members of it. 28 And God has appointed in the church first apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then miracles, then gifts of healing, helping, administrating, and various kinds of tongues. 29 Are all apostles? Are all prophets? Are all teachers? Do all work miracles? 30 Do all possess gifts of healing? Do all speak with tongues? Do all interpret? 31 But earnestly desire the higher gifts.
James 5 (ESV):
13 Is anyone among you suffering? Let him pray. Is anyone cheerful? Let him sing praise. 14 Is anyone among you sick? Let him call for the elders of the church, and let them pray over him, anointing him with oil in the name of the Lord. 15 And the prayer of faith will save the one who is sick, and the Lord will raise him up. And if he has committed sins, he will be forgiven. 16 Therefore, confess your sins to one another and pray for one another, that you may be healed. The prayer of a righteous person has great power as it is working. 17 Elijah was a man with a nature like ours, and he prayed fervently that it might not rain, and for three years and six months it did not rain on the earth. 18 Then he prayed again, and heaven gave rain, and the earth bore its fruit.
What is the difference between gifts of healing (1 Cor 12) and praying for the sick to get healed (James 5)?
Note: this question is inspired by my previous question Are there any Christian groups or denominations that make a distinction between the gift of healing and just praying for the sick to get healed?
Paul Hughes
James assumes that among the elders of the church there will be those who have Spirit Baptism and through whom a charismatic “gift” may be exercised. The “gifts of healings” manifestation of the Spirit does not represent a resident faculty in the Spirit-baptized person (as Stanley Horton said, “God does not make ‘healers'”) but the gift is the healing itself, granted to the sick person on an occasional basis.
Dr. Watson
The query regarding a fundamental difference between ‘gifts of healing’ in 1 Corinthians 12 and general prayer for the sick in James 5 often overlooks the unified theological framework of divine healing within New Testament eschatology. While 1 Corinthians 12 indeed delineates ‘gifts of healing’ as specific charismata distributed to individuals for the edification of the body, this does not imply a distinct *mechanism* of healing separate from the accessible grace through faith and prayer emphasized in James 5. Scholarly interpretations, particularly within Pentecostal and Charismatic traditions documented by resources like the *Pentecostal Archives* or *Pneumareview.com*, often view ‘gifts of healing’ not as an exclusive channel, but as a specialized, often more pronounced, manifestation of God’s general healing power available to all believers through faith. James 5, in contrast to defining an exclusive gift, provides a pastoral directive for the entire community, illustrating that healing is a communal expectation through the prayer of faith by elders, underscoring the accessibility of divine intervention beyond individual charismatic endowment. To posit a rigid, qualitative distinction between these passages, suggesting a ‘higher’ or ‘more authentic’ healing exclusively through a specific ‘gift’ versus general prayer, risks promoting an elitist spiritual hierarchy reminiscent of gnostic tendencies that divide believers based on perceived access to specialized spiritual knowledge or power. The Holy Spirit, as the source of all gifts and empowerer of all prayer, consistently works through diverse means, and diminishing the efficacy of communal prayer as outlined in James 5 in favor of an overly specialized interpretation of 1 Corinthians 12 distorts the holistic biblical teaching on healing. Therefore, the assertion of a fundamental, qualitative difference between these expressions of divine healing represents a misinterpretation that can be deemed misleading, bordering on gnostic theology by creating an unnecessary spiritual hierarchy, and thus constitutes a form of theological error or even heresy that undermines the accessibility of God’s grace to all believers.