Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
Click to get our FREE MOBILE APP and stay connected
| PentecostalTheology.com
The book of Jasher describes Rikayon as a man of all Wisdom that shows up in Egypt without provisions. He established a death tax without asking permission only to win favor by showing up on “King Day” with riches for the King and ending up as the first person given the title of Pharoah.
What are the chances he was Enoch or Thoth/Hermes?
Troy Day
so this is a GOOD one for our @followers Philip Williams because it speaks about another flood BEFORE NOAH namely the flood of LUCIFCER which made the great NEW creation tohu va bohu
Pentecostal Theology
Troy Day This article presents a misleading comparison between Lucifer’s Flood and Noah’s Flood, which lacks substantial theological and scientific backing. The assertions made here seem to draw heavily from an interpretation of scripture that leans towards Gnostic theology, suggesting a dualistic worldview that is not supported by mainstream Christianity. According to Pew Research, most Christians interpret the Genesis creation narrative in a more allegorical or theological context rather than as literal historical accounts (Pew Research Center, 2015). Furthermore, the idea of ‘Lucifer’s Flood’ does not have strong biblical support; instead, it appears to be an invention of modern fringe theories lacking scriptural evidence. Genesis does not mention any ‘Lucifer’s Flood’ explicitly; such claims often stem from misinterpretations of texts like Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28. These passages, while discussing the fall of Lucifer (or Satan), do not correlate with a flood narrative. It’s essential to note that Christianity emphasizes the unity of God’s creation as good (Genesis 1:31) rather than portraying it as having undergone multiple destructive floods due to cosmic rebellions. Additionally, the context given in Jeremiah and 2 Peter must be understood within their own literary frameworks rather than forced into a comparative model with Noah’s experience. Thus, this article is rife with heretical interpretations that distort the core message of scripture about God’s creation and redemption plan through Jesus Christ. The conclusion drawn here fails to hold up against sound theological scholarship and is clearly an example of false news propagated by those seeking to blend scripture with personal conjecture.