The gospels seem to attribute the conception of Jesus to holy breath (το γαρ εν αυτη γεννηθεν εκ πνευματος εστιν αγιου):
Yet Jesus’ father is not “the power of the most high” but rather the most high himself AND David:
Why isn’t the breath/spirit considered Jesus’ father? In these gospel passages is the breath/spirit a person? Or God’s “power” and creative “organ”?
This is the BDAG entry for the verb which appears in Matthew 1:20 as “conceived”:
γεννάω fut. γεννήσω; 1 aor. ἐγέννησα; pf. γεγέννηκα. Pass.: fut. pl.
γεννηθήσεσθε Sir 41:9; 1 aor. ἐγεννήθην; pf. γεγέννημαι (Pind.,
Hdt.+).—See ARahlfs, Genesis 1926, 39. Gener., to cause someth. to
come into existence, primarily through procreation or parturition. ①
become the parent of, beget ⓐ by procreation (oft. LXX, fr. Gen 4:18
on) Mt 1:2–20 (cp. Diod S 4, 67, 2–68, 6, the genealogy of the
Aeolians: 67, 4 Ἄρνη ἐγέννησεν Αἰόλον κ. Βοιωτόν; 67, 7 Ἱππάλκιμος
ἐγέννησε Πηνέλεων; 68:1 Σαλμωνεὺς ἐγέννησε θυγατέρα … Τυρώ; 68, 3
Ποσειδῶν ἐγέννησε Πελίαν κ. Νηλέα; 68, 6 Νηλεὺς παῖδας ἐγέννησε
δώδεκα. Interchanged with ἐγέννησε are ἐτέκνωσε, ἦν υἱός, παῖδες
ἐγένοντο, etc.; cp. PMich 155, 7. The continuity is not formalized to
the degree in Mt, but in Diod S 4, 69, 1–3 ἐγέννησε is repeated six
times in a short space, and 4, 75, 4f ἐγέννησε occurs four times with
the names of fathers and sons; Did., Gen. 144, 27); Ac 7:8, 29. ἐκ w.
gen. of the mother (Hdt. 1, 108, 2; Diod S 4, 2, 1; 4, 62, 1; Palaeph.
44; PLond V, 1730, 10 οἱ ἐξ αὐτῆς γεννηθέντες υἱοί; Tob 1:9; 2 Esdr
10:44; Demetr.: 722 Fgm. 2, 2 Jac.; TestJob 1:6; Jos, Ant. 12, 189) Mt
1:3, 5f.—Pass. be fathered (Orig., C. Cels. 8, 66, 23) ἐκ τῆς
παιδίσκης κατὰ σάρκα w. the slave-woman, according to the flesh (i.e.
in line with human devising; opp. διʼ ἐπαγγελίας) Gal 4:23. ὁ κατὰ
σάρκα γεννηθείς he that was fathered by human design, opp. ὁ κατὰ
πνεῦμα he that was fathered by the Spirit’s design, i.e. in keeping
with the divine promise, vs. 23) vs. 29. τὸ ἐν αὐτῇ γεννηθὲν ἐκ
πνεύματός ἐστιν that which is conceived in her is of the Spirit Mt
1:20 (τὸ γεννηθέν of that which is yet unborn: Diod S 17, 77, 3). Here
the male principle is introduced by ἐκ (Lucian, Dial. Deor. 20, 14 ἐκ
κύκνου γεγεννημένη; Phlegon: 257 Fgm. 36, 2, 4 Jac.; Ps-Callisth. 1,
30, 3 ἐξ Ἄμμωνος ἐγεννήθη; TestSim 2:2) as J 1:13 (ἐγενήθ. P75et al.);
but in 3:6 the imagery is complex, involving a maternal aspect in vs.
4. W. ἀπό (En 15:8 οἱ γίγαντες οἱ γεννηθέντες ἀπὸ τ. πνευμάτων κ. σαρκός) ἀφʼ ἑνὸς ἐγεννήθησαν they were fathered by one man Hb 11:12
(numerous edd. ἐγενήθησαν). ἐκ πορνείας οὐ γεγεννήμεθα (v.l.
ἐγεννήθημεν) J 8:41 (cp. StudPal XX, 4, 30 ἐξ ἀγράφων γάμων
γεγεννῆσθαι). ἐν ἁμαρτίαις σὺ ἐγεννήθης ὅλος you’re a born sinner,
totally! 9:34.—Lk 1:35 (where mng. 2 is also prob. [as in τὸ
γεννώμενον Philo, Plant. 15]. S. AFridrichsen, SymbOsl 6, 1928, 33–36;
HAlmqvist, Plut. u. d. NT ’46, 60f). ⓑ by exercising the role of a
parental figure, ext. of 1a (Philo, Leg. ad Gai. 58 μᾶλλον αὐτὸν τῶν
γονέων γεγέννηκα), of a teacher on pupils ἐν Χ. Ἰ. διὰ τοῦ εὐαγγελίου
ὑμᾶς ἐγέννησα I became your father as Christians through the gospel 1
Cor 4:15; Phlm 10 (s. Ltzm. and JWeiss on 1 Cor 4:15; ADieterich,
Mithraslit. 1903, 146ff).—Pass. ἐκ (τοῦ) θεοῦ γεννᾶσθαι J 1:13 (on the
rdg. of the Lat. ms. b, s. JPryor, NovT 27, ’85, 296–318); 1J 2:29;
3:9; 4:7; 5:1, 4, 18. On γεννᾶσθαι ἐξ ὕδατος κ. πνεύματος J 3:5 cp.
1QS 4:20–22 and s. YYadin, JBL 74, ’55, 40–43. Also ἄνωθεν γ. J 3:3,
7. πᾶς ὁ ἀγαπῶν τὸν γεννήσαντα ἀγαπᾷ τὸν γεγεννημένον ἐξ αὐτοῦ everyone who loves the father (=God) loves the child (=Christ or one’s
fellow Christian) 1J 5:1 (on γεννᾶσθαι ἐκ θεοῦ s. Hdb. on J 3:3 and 1J
3:9 and the sources and lit. listed there; s. also παλιγγενεσία). Cp.
σήμερον γεγέννηκά σε (Ps 2:7) 1 Cl 36:4; GEb 18, 37; Ac 13:33 (held by
some to have been the orig. rdg. Lk 3:22 v.l.; s. JHillmann, Die
Kindheitsgesch. Jesu nach Lucas: Jahrbücher f. Protestantische
Theologie 17/2, 1891, 192–261; HUsener, D. Weihnachtsfest2 1911,
38ff); Hb 1:5; 5:5. p 194 ② to give birth to, bear (Aeschyl.,
Suppl. 48; X., De Rep. Lac. 1, 3; Lucian, Sacrif. 6; Plut., Mor., 3c;
Ps.-Callisth. 1, 9, 2 ἐκ θεοῦ γεννήσασα παῖδα=a woman who has borne a
child to a god; BGU 132 II, 5; Judg 11:1 B; Is 66:9; 4 Macc 10:2) Lk
1:13, 57; 23:29; J 16:21 w. τίκτειν; AcPl Ha 8, 28 εἰς δουλείαν
γεννῶσα who bears children for slavery Gal 4:24. Pass. be born (ἐκ
παρθένου Did., Gen. 96, 13) ἐγεννήθη Μωϋσῆς Ac 7:20; cp. Hb 11:23.
γεγεννημένος ἐν Ταρσῷ Ac 22:3; μήπω … γεννηθέντων Ro 9:11; πρὶν ἡμᾶς
γεννηθῆναι before we were born 1 Cl 38:3. εἰς τὸν κόσμον come into the
world J 16:21; Mt 2:1, 4; 19:12; 26:24 (=1 Cl 46:8); Mk 14:21 (cp. En
38:2); Lk 1:35 (1a is also prob.; a v.l. adds ἐκ σοῦ, which can be
rendered ‘the child to whom you give birth’). ἐκ Μαρίας ἐγεννήθη
AcPlCor 1:14; 2:5 (cp. Mt 1:16); J 3:4; 9:2, 19f, 32; IEph 18:2; ITr
11:2; ἀληθῶς γ. be in fact born (in opp. to Docetism) 9:1. γεγεννημένα
(v.l. γεγενημένα) εἰς ἅλωσιν 2 Pt 2:12. εἰς τοῦτο for this purpose J
18:37. διάλεκτος ἐν ᾑ ἐγεννήθημεν the language in which we were born
i.e., which we have spoken fr. infancy Ac 2:8. ἐγὼ δὲ καὶ γεγέννημαι
but I was actually born a Roman citizen 22:28. οὗτος ἐγεννήθη βασιλεύς
born a king GJs 20:4 codd. γεννῶνται και γεννῶσιν Lk 20:34 v.l. ③ to
cause someth. to happen, bring forth, produce, cause, fig. of various
kinds of production (Pla. et al.; Polyb. 1, 67, 2 στάσις ἐγεννᾶτο;
Philo, De Jos. 254; Jos., Ant. 6, 144) 2 Ti 2:23.—γ. καρπόν produce
fruit (Philo, Op. M. 113) ITr 11:1. Forged writing γεγεννημένον for
γεγενημένον GJs 24:3.—B. 280. DELG s.v. γίγνομαι p. 222. M-M. TW.
Arndt, W., Danker, F. W., & Bauer, W. (2000). A Greek-English lexicon
of the New Testament and other early Christian literature (3rd ed.,
pp. 193–194). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Anonymous
William DeArteaga Neil Steven Lawrence Nelson Banuchi Link Hudson Terry Wiles Peter Vandever Joseph D. Absher I trust the Lord to grant a revival when it is most needed! However, I think that we Pentecostals who see revival as the normative position for the Church are wrong. Revival comes when the Church needs it, and a revival like that of Azusa Street can kick those who are disposed to following Christ, to a new level of commitment. Once they have reached it, the need for revival is gone. Besides, the energy level that it takes to run a revival for even three years is exhausting! People get tired.
Anonymous
This is what works Joseph D. Absher Robert Dickinson Robert Davis Robert Cox Jesse Morrell https://www.pentecostaltheology.com/tips-for-street-preaching-personal-witnessing/
Anonymous
Ilya Okhotnikov apart from this old video I really did not find much on the subject obviously disregarding the Tommy Welchel telling it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdD2RfcJXp0
Anonymous
Troy Day I would not reference anything from Sid Roth.
Anonymous
Bishop Bernie L Wade Ricky Grimsley Peter Vandever https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AGde14OSkL0
Anonymous
I have heard the idea that restoring praise restores the tabernacle of David in Indonesia. Was thatba latter rain teaching. I never heard it in GBI but maybe the Pak Niko teaches it now. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cmm8u25VrhQ
Anonymous
hey Link Hudson remember when Jim Price stated that HE read Dr. Niko’s message and certainly it was very moving, more so to listen to than to read as is most messages when you or in a great convention. Most of us who grew up in a pentecostal environment have heard such rousing sermons. There was a lot of rhetorical content but I think it was meant to persuade and motivate in a positive way. However any good bible student could find points of disagreement. His comments about the third pentecost was somewhat different than I have ever heard. ” The first pentecost was when God came to His people. The second pentecost was when He came upon His people, and the third pentecost will be when He comes into His people. ” The words TO and UPON and INTO and the timing of that could certainly be argued. But it looked like several thousand were in the giant convention hall in Indonesia that alone is something to shout about. Some might complain about all the money spent on airline tickets,hotel rooms and meals but Amway representatives fill up that same hall and spend millions to push their products; so why not those that go in the name of Jesus?
Anonymous
Troy Day that sort of thing might have to be judged like a prophecy. It is confusing when such is just delivered as a seemin and you can’t tell what is the speaker’s theological explanation.
I don’t know if I’ve heard a prophecy given in GBI, but back when Pak Niko was the leader of the Jakarta Bethany leaders before the split, in a worker’s meeting for a Bethany English service, one woman gave one in Indonesian but I didn’t know the language enough to understand. I think it was first person style prophesy. I remember a friend not agreeing with it and expressing concern at people receiving it with Amen. She thought it was judgemental, and I don’t know if the issue was her theoligical grid. I have heard of prophecies from smaller GBI churches outside of Jakarta.
Anonymous
Azusa street was a false spiritual event; deception.
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess what is @everyone thinking on this one?
Anonymous
Troy Day he needs to be removed from the group….he’s against the Pentecostal faith….always talking down on us
Anonymous
At Pentecost they were accused of being drunk. But They were all filled with the Holy Spirit.
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess no matter what you said just stick to the scriptures, but make sure nothing plasphiem.
Anonymous
Stevenson Mark well how do you apply Scripture here? You got to show some logic and wisdom from time to time
Anonymous
Christopher Wiles the question was about the post not about our old friend Duane L Burgess maybe if you are spiritual enough the Spirit will jump from you on him? 🙂
Anonymous
David Levandusky question is about the 100yr prophecy ppl promoted but Peter Vandever said it was fake AND William DeArteaga may have wrote about it in the book J.D. King published @ one time or another
Anonymous
Troy Day plasphiem against the Holy Spirit is nothing to do at all.
Anonymous
Troy Day I got some spirit for him alright
…I pray the holy ghost hit him so hard he can’t talk for 3 days but nothing but tongues will come from his mouth
Anonymous
Stevenson Mark are you still talking about the OP or is this some random rant before your morning coffee ?
Anonymous
Troy Day 🙄😣
Anonymous
Christopher Wiles maybe you better pray then instead of slander so early in the morning NOW what is your take on the actual OP
Anonymous
DrCarmen Aiken-Isaac yes pls DO enlighten us good Dr
Anonymous
Troy Day He’s ignorant and derives pleasure from trolling. I’d remove him.
Anonymous
Jack Marsh my question was bout OP brother 🙂
Anonymous
Troy Day John MacArthur would say the same thing. Nothing new … & this person may not even be a cessationist. I don’t know. I rarely participate here. There was one guy a couple of yrs ago who let it be known that he didn’t believe that Jesus was the God-Man, so, there’s no tellin’ what kind of beliefs are flying around in this group. But you go get ‘em, Troy. …👍🏾
Anonymous
DrCarmen Aiken-Isaac who cares about ol crazy John MacArthur here? tell us your thinking on the OP
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess Then why are you in a Pentecostal group who treasure what happened ar Azusa Street as revival from Heaven?
Anonymous
Mike Crain back to the OP maybe?
Anonymous
Troy Day I just don’t get why he would want to be here if he doesn’t hold to traditional Pentecostal beliefs
Anonymous
Mike Crain my question was bout the actual OP here
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess
Prove it.
Anonymous
Junior Beasley are you 2 NOT talking about the OP?
Anonymous
Troy Day I’ll have to check out the video and see.
Anonymous
Mike Crain oh sorry – was thinking you know well Azusa related prophecy and other documented Pentecostal matters
Anonymous
Troy Day
Anonymous
yes Joellen?
Anonymous
Troy Day mistake,I’m sorry
Anonymous
Joellen Akers no prob What is your take on this OP?
Anonymous
Troy Day
I don’t know what ur talking about
Anonymous
Junior Beasley you dont see the OP? what are you talking about here then? There is a specific OP posted – stay withing the current discussion and keep focused
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess
Media: https://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fmedia3.giphy.com%2Fmedia%2Fv1.Y2lkPTk5OWFjZWFjYzZzcmE4a2p5ZWVhdW84b3F1ODRlNHNlc2x6ZGZneW1pOGlsZWRhcSZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n%2Fi7PM4udF7hrjzmojpd%2Fgiphy.gif&h=AT1UClznMTZR1osG_MFODRNv5C78ziiShOzTvisUa1yAnEHOtPQDrWHE4AoH0YVfg3h-twcfe0mTjQiuJcIl49NH_UoxS-k5q3uPhmgY1Cgw9FBWxdszCLvHDQZppKlU&s=1
Anonymous
Troy Day receive the Holly Ghost 🙏
Anonymous
Mark Aponte anything on the actual OP
?
Anonymous
Troy Day Duane L Burgess Is a liar and doesn’t even know what he is talking about.
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess amen
Anonymous
Troy Day with respect, as a former Pentecostal I simply don’t believe Azusa street was a legitimate revival.
Anonymous
Sinadou Marcellin with respect, I simply don’t think Azusa street was Holy Ghost led. I’m willing to be corrected.
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess I can see why the narrative would say that, but we know better
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess
On what do you base this?
Anonymous
Barrie Bloxsom Careful study of Scripture. II Tim. 2:15. Pentecostalism has always been an aberration in the Church. Theological problems.
Anonymous
Mark Aponte what proof do you have?
Anonymous
Troy Day
I thank he need to pray and ask God to open his under standing, because he is blind to the truth and the word of God
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess hard statement to back up. It happened in our generation with eyewitness who were interviewed. The structure which was only wood is long gone. Unfortunate for Spiritual Tourism, could you imagine what could have happened if a denomination say Foursquare or Trinity Broadcasting purchased it.built a chapel much with a museum having pictures of the events with present day intercessions and prophets working there?
Anonymous
many of yall here are not nice to ol Duane and are way OFF topic too
Anonymous
Where’s the part about Pentecostalism?
Anonymous
Duane L Burgess Were you THERE?
Anonymous
Christopher Wiles, he must be Baptist and if so, talking about false, most of them believe that the only true Bible is the KJV, but most of them call it the King James Bible (that’s false) and adhere to their church comes from John the Baptist
Anonymous
Dwayne Faircloth oh I know about the Baptist beliefs
Anonymous
Christopher Wiles there are many things they are strong and deep in scripture but miss many.
Anonymous
Dwayne Faircloth are you baptist too or cog?
Anonymous
Troy Day blasphemy
Anonymous
DrCarmen Aiken-Isaac didn’t believe that Jesus was the God-Man?
This must have been Philip Williams or some other pope-lover
Anonymous
Brownsville if he was off by 15 years.
Anonymous
Junior Beasley Brownsville was a sham like I told Peter Vandever what about the actual AZUSA prophecy ?
Anonymous
Troy Day we’ll thatvyiur opinion I was there it was a mighty out pouring that hit every church around there.
Anonymous
Troy Day people who got saved at Brownsville might disagree.
Anonymous
Link Hudson let them speak on their behalf then
Anonymous
Melvin Harter Junior Beasley Bishop Bernie L Wade Peter Vandever
There are no contemporary witnesses to this “prophecy.” Zero. It is fictional as are many Azusa stories. If it was a prophesy given by Seymour (and it was not) it would most certainly be a false prophesy. Seymour died more than 100 years ago and the window for such a prophesy to be fulfilled has closed.
It seems he means well, but the Azusa Mission could not hold hundreds of people. Lots of smoke and mirrors in this report (literally and figuratively) While nearly all of those who recognize the manifestation of the Holy Spirit in a Pentecostal or Apostolic imprimatur have commonality with the Topeka Outpouring, there are many who have no connection to Los Angeles. Those connected to the Los Angeles Outpouring came from some 8 different churches – not just the Azusa Street Mission. The Apostolic Faith Movement was already global before 1906. Likely, the largest outpouring of the day was in Zion, Illinois. Norris repeatedly mentions the Shekhinah. Does he understand that is a Kaballistic term describe the “feminine nature of God” or “the Divine Feminine”? Lots of things sound cool, but we must be careful. That is the view from my porch.
Anonymous
This is all I could find about Seymour’s prophecy. It is NOT well documented @ all. There’s lots of speculation 1909, 1910, 1913, 1922 around his death and so on… Apart from that ppl seem NOT to know that Azusa was over and gone by 1909. Some cite the prophecy from his travelling notes, which you have studied extensively for your book series on Azusa…
It all comes down to Tommy’s book with a single quote from a testimony by one David Garcia who was a boy during Azusa, but recalls being told the words of the prophecy. I will try to attach Tommy’s whole book, but here is the only quote of interest:
“p38 Brother Garcia was the first to tell me of Seymour‘s prophesy that in about 100 years there would be a return of the Shekinah Glory and a revival that would surpass the Works of God at Azusa.*
It was forty years ago that we spoke, and Brother Garcia told of the 100 year prophesy by Brother Seymour concerning the fresh outpouring of God‘s Spirit.
As this book is being written, people all over the world are celebrating the Azusa Centennial. I pray the prayer of my dear friend and brother, David Garcia, that soon we will see Brother Seymour‘s prophesy fulfilled and the greatest visitation of God ever known to man fall fresh on this world.
*Charles Parham also prophesied that another great revival would happen in about 100 years.
Seymour, who made the prophesy around 1909 or 1910 may have made this prophesy after Parham.”
Anonymous
Troy Day is Dr Larry Martin part of this group, he could possibly cast more light on the subject. We none were there but the effect is undeniable. I was there at the 100th anniversary along thousands of others. I would want to know the actual wording of the prophecy.
Anonymous
Azusa had good and bad! It really did!
You can’t do camera trick in 1901 like you could in even 1991 technologies!
I’ve seen raw footage about 10yrs ago of Azusa meeting where a woman’s leg appeared to grow 3 inches! There was no AI, or IGI etc, per-se! There was no big screens, and pi k lights, with a punky youth pastor hyping the crowd!
It’s not Azusa you should worry about, it’s the stuff that yet another almost 100yrs more! This weird spooky spiritual “Dance in the River of wine, Feel God’s heartbeat in your ear, Call down fire: hoopla! The drunken and drugged references to God and Holy Spirit!
Azusa might have scared the 1848 Wesleyans…..but this 100yr yet more New-Age, Mysticism coated in Pentecistal stule meryingvwirzhip….makes even half Bible based fear of God Pentecostals of all generations if truly in the word; cringe!
And that’s what we should be warning about, not Azusa, to be honest!
Anonymous
Jàyson Jàyson Jàyson OK spill it out what was the bad?
Anonymous
In what? The Azusa or this newer ladt 3 decades crap?
The Azusa well, okay maybe it wasn’t any bad back then that you can see per-se like now, but any true move of God always had Medium to major hindrances that maybe the average person couldnt even detect! Like someone mocking, or deliberate fake tongues along with the real!
There wasn’t near as much crap there as there is in this new century!
Maybe it wasn’t even Azusa then I’m thinking of….But Im sure itvwas there, or something shortly shortly after in the same tome frame related to Azusa with a lady Aimee MacPherson that a couple things was a no no!
I’m not going into everything, because I’d have to find it! It may be no longer available on YouTube!
Anonymous
BOTTOM LINE Jàyson Jàyson Jàyson Peter Vandever not even Philip Williams or Link Hudson has produced a single shred of evidence that any such prophecy ever took place @ Azusa
Anonymous
Troy Day have I claimed to have any?
Anonymous
I dont know Link Hudson have you?
Anonymous
There is a lot of sensationalism connected to the Apostolic Faith Gospel Mission (modern apologists have renamed it Azusa Street). It was evident to Bishop William Seymour knew this first hand. We have the letter he wrote to his spiritual father, Charles F. Parham asking for help against these workers of darkness. They were so powerful they put Charles Parham out of their building (but he remained in Los Angeles area preaching). So it is possible that such a thing was offered there, but the prophecy is bogus regardless of the source.
Anonymous
Bishop Bernie L Wade but there is NO 100 year prophecy, right ?
Anonymous
https://www.amazon.com/Legacy-Charles-Sarah-Eleanor-Parham/dp/195225325X
Anonymous
so where is all this sensationalism connected 100 yr fake prophecy comes from?
Anonymous
What is the purpose of looking back at Azusa to judge? Many great people and things came out of Azusa Street. Who here can judge what God used to win many souls?
Anonymous
Judith Smith thats the point
we are looing back at Azusa to preserve our heritage
but we do look at fake prophecy to sort them out William DeArteaga
Anonymous
Troy Day Generally it is good to ignore those who hide behind fake profiles. Especially if they are atempting to protect fake prophecy. Very suspect! Smile.
Anonymous
Judith Smith like Bishop Bernie L Wade just said !!! Alan Smith 🙂
Anonymous
Troy Daynothing in the past can be changed. There’s enough fake prophesy to deal with today.
Anonymous
Bishop Bernie L Wadeinstead if answering the question, you have to dig into someone’s profile? Profiles are not the topic of the discussion, is it? The one who concerns themself with a profile rather than the topic is fake.