Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
| PentecostalTheology.com
The book review of Julie C. Ma and Wonsuk Ma’s *Mission in the Spirit: Towards a Pentecostal/Charismatic Missiology* identifies the work as a crucial contribution to both Pentecostal and broader missiological discourse. The authors provide a foundational theology of mission, practical case studies, and directions for future research. Ma and Ma propose a framework rooted in the Holy Spirit’s involvement in creation and re-creation, arguing for a deeper missionary engagement beyond the initial “eschatological urgency” and subsequent focus on “transforming the world this side of heaven.” Their central thesis positions mission at the heart of God’s historical activity, emphasizing the restoration of creation. A significant aspect of *Mission in the Spirit* is its practical model for mission, termed “full circle mission.” This model underscores the vital role of charismatic leadership, drawing on the tradition of spiritual empowerment for mission. It posits that mission begins with Spirit-empowered leaders who plant new churches and nurture them to maturity. Crucially, these new churches are then expected to become mission-minded themselves, initiating their own church planting efforts, thus completing the “circle.” This practical framework is supported by a concise biblical theology of mission, which highlights the importance of Spirit baptism in empowering all believers for witness and demonstrating God’s power, ultimately leading to the growth of new Pentecostal congregations. The book extensively explores the importance of context, particularly drawing on the rapid changes and economic poverty observed in Asian and, specifically, Philippine contexts, where Pentecostalism has experienced significant growth. A key contribution is the concept of “power contextualization,” building on the work of scholars such as John Wimber and Charles Kraft. Ma and Ma argue that power encounters are not merely spiritual but possess profound sociological impacts, particularly in tribal societies, where they facilitate worldview transformation. In situations of poverty, these encounters offer tangible benefits through healing and liberation from fear, presenting a holistic approach worthy of further study. Furthermore, Pentecostal worship is presented as a vital setting where contextualization is reinforced through sermons, scripture, and Spirit manifestations, necessitating a contextually sensitive approach to demonology, deliverance, and even the liberation of women in Asia. While commending the book’s call for reflective mission practice and its appeal to cross-cultural missionaries focused on church growth, the reviewer also highlights certain tensions and limitations. The collection, being an edited compilation of articles, is deemed illustrative rather than comprehensively exhaustive, leading to inconsistent engagement with contemporary missiological discussions. A notable concern raised is the perceived lack of emphasis on broader issues such as peace, justice, reconciliation, and the care of creation, which seems incongruous with a theological framework rooted in creation. This omission leaves several questions unanswered regarding the deeper, holistic mission suggested in earlier chapters, indicating areas for future Pentecostal research as acknowledged by the authors themselves. Despite these critical observations, *Mission in the Spirit* is ultimately recognized as a significant achievement in deepening the Pentecostal understanding of mission. It offers valuable insights that can assist many Pentecostal leaders in Asia—who often lack formal theological training—to critically reflect on their missional practices. The review concludes by affirming the book’s indispensable nature for future studies in missiology, underscoring its capacity to provoke crucial reflection and advance the discourse within Pentecostal and broader missiological circles.
