Intelligent Design Bad Science

Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars

PNEUMA: The Pentecostal Theology, in its Spring 2006 issue (Volume 28, Number 1), presents a robust collection of scholarly contributions reflecting the breadth and depth of contemporary Pentecostal thought. Edited by Frank D. Macchia of Vanguard University, with an extensive team of associate editors drawn from diverse academic institutions such as the University of Chicago Divinity School, Drew Theological School, Fuller Theological Seminary, and Duke Divinity School, the journal establishes itself as a significant platform for theological discourse. This particular issue features an editorial, several articles, a dialogue section, a review essay, and a comprehensive array of book reviews, collectively addressing critical theological and ecclesiological questions pertinent to Pentecostalism and the broader Christian landscape. The issue opens with an editorial by Frank D. Macchia, titled “Intelligent Design: Bad Science?,” where he clarifies his position on the intelligent design (ID) debate following media misrepresentations. Macchia traces the historical argument for ID, noting that the universe’s inherent complexity has long suggested an intelligent designer. He highlights the contemporary focus on Michael J. Behe’s concept of “irreducible complexity,” particularly at the molecular level, arguing that certain biological systems are so interdependent they could not have evolved incrementally without losing function, thus implying a deliberate creation. Macchia delves into the academic reception of ID, acknowledging its widespread rejection within the scientific community, which often categorizes it as theology rather than science. He posits a more nuanced view, suggesting ID functions as both, though its explanatory power is deeply influenced by one’s worldview. While he concedes that evolutionary theory possesses substantial explanatory breadth for a vast array of phenomena, making it unlikely to be displaced by ID within secular science, he argues that from a biblical or faith perspective, ID offers compelling insight. In this light, the “irreducible complexity” discovered by Behe can be interpreted as a divine signature, confirming God’s involvement in creation without negating all aspects of evolutionary processes. Ultimately, Macchia concludes that intelligent design should not be dismissed as “bad science,” but rather understood as “science from within a faith perspective.” While he predicts its limited acceptance within the secular scientific academy, he recognizes its valuable role in theological apologetics and its potential to prompt contemplation of a transcendent mystery at the heart of existence. Beyond this engaging editorial, the issue features diverse articles exploring themes such as the integration of pneumatology and Christology, Jürgen Moltmann’s eschatology, the intersection of Pentecostalism with nationalism and culture, the rise of healing rooms, and the impact of the renewal movement on theological education. Furthermore, dedicated sections for scholarly dialogue and extensive book reviews—covering topics from Eastern Orthodoxy and charismatic experience to African Charismatics and the Word of Faith movement—underscore the journal’s commitment to broad intellectual inquiry and its role in shaping contemporary Pentecostal theological discourse.