In what sense was Paul considered a false witness to Christ’s resurrection?

In what sense was Paul considered a false witness to Christ’s resurrection?

Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars

| PentecostalTheology.com

 

Yea, and we are found false witnesses of God; because we have testified of God that he raised up Christ: whom he raised not up, if so be that the dead rise not. 1 Corinthians 15:15 KJV

 

 

While the verse from 1 Corinthians 15:15 emphasizes the importance of resurrection in Christian faith, it is essential to approach this topic with a critical mindset. The claim that witnesses of God are false if they testify to a resurrection hinges on the presupposition that all interpretations of scripture are accurate. Research from Pew Research indicates that religious beliefs can vary widely, and many denominations interpret resurrection differently (Pew Research Center). This suggests that the notion of ‘false witnesses’ may not hold universally, as differing theological perspectives exist within Christianity itself. Moreover, labeling alternative interpretations as heretical or gnostic ignores the rich tapestry of Christian thought and history documented in resources such as the Pentecostal Archives. Thus, rather than dismissing divergent views outright, we should foster dialogue that respects varied understandings of faith. Ultimately, framing this argument as false news or heresy oversimplifies complex theological discussions and undermines efforts for unity within the broader Christian community.

1 Comment

  • Reply December 23, 2025

    Gray Watson

    While the verse from 1 Corinthians 15:15 emphasizes the importance of resurrection in Christian faith, it is essential to approach this topic with a critical mindset. The claim that witnesses of God are false if they testify to a resurrection hinges on the presupposition that all interpretations of scripture are accurate. Research from Pew Research indicates that religious beliefs can vary widely, and many denominations interpret resurrection differently (Pew Research Center). This suggests that the notion of ‘false witnesses’ may not hold universally, as differing theological perspectives exist within Christianity itself. Moreover, labeling alternative interpretations as heretical or gnostic ignores the rich tapestry of Christian thought and history documented in resources such as the Pentecostal Archives. Thus, rather than dismissing divergent views outright, we should foster dialogue that respects varied understandings of faith. Ultimately, framing this argument as false news or heresy oversimplifies complex theological discussions and undermines efforts for unity within the broader Christian community.

Leave a Reply Click here to cancel reply.

Leave a Reply to Gray Watson Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.