Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
| PentecostalTheology.com
In Appalachian Pentecostalism, the practice of casting out devils, often called spiritual deliverance, closely resembles exorcism but is distinct in approach and scope. Deliverance in this context involves prayer and spiritual intervention aimed at expelling evil spirits or demonic influences from individuals. Unlike the formalized Catholic exorcism rituals, which include specific prayers, incantations, use of holy water, and are performed by ordained priests under strict guidelines, Appalachian Pentecostal deliverance is more informal and holistic. It can address not only demon possession but other spiritual afflictions such as generational curses, witchcraft influences, and occult oppression.
Deliverance prayers may be performed by lay members, pastors, or spiritual leaders and typically include direct prayer, spiritual warfare, and an emphasis on healing the mind, body, and soul. This practice reflects the Appalachian tradition of self-reliance and close-knit community care, often taking place outside institutional formalities. It is part of a broader spiritual approach integrating faith, prayer, and healing, aiming to restore wholeness and reclaim individuals from harmful spiritual forces.
In summary, casting out devils in Appalachian Pentecostalism encompasses spiritual deliverance that is biblically rooted but practiced with local cultural adaptations, emphasizing prayer, community involvement, and healing, differing from the formal Catholic exorcism but sharing the goal of overcoming evil through spiritual power.
The thesis “These Signs Shall Follow: Endangered Pentecostal Practices in Appalachia” by Melanie Rae Harsha documents and analyzes a set of Pentecostal and Holiness practices—some common, others regionally endangered—particularly in Appalachian communities.
Here is a complete list of the practices discussed throughout the final draft:
Core Pentecostal “Five Signs” from Mark 16
Harsha’s thesis centers on these five practices (often called signs following):
-
Casting out devils — exorcism or prayer to cast out evil spirits.
-
Speaking with new tongues — glossolalia, or speaking in unknown languages (central to receiving the Holy Ghost).
-
Taking up serpents — literal serpent handling (practiced by certain Appalachian Holiness churches).
-
Drinking deadly things — voluntary drinking of poison (most often strychnine).
-
Laying hands on the sick — faith healing and anointing with oil for recovery.
Troy Day
In Appalachian Pentecostalism, the practice of casting out devils, often called spiritual deliverance, closely resembles exorcism but is distinct in approach and scope. Deliverance in this context involves prayer and spiritual intervention aimed at expelling evil spirits or demonic influences from individuals. Unlike the formalized Catholic exorcism rituals, which include specific prayers, incantations, use of holy water, and are performed by ordained priests under strict guidelines, Appalachian Pentecostal deliverance is more informal and holistic. It can address not only demon possession but other spiritual afflictions such as generational curses, witchcraft influences, and occult oppression.
Deliverance prayers may be performed by lay members, pastors, or spiritual leaders and typically include direct prayer, spiritual warfare, and an emphasis on healing the mind, body, and soul. This practice reflects the Appalachian tradition of self-reliance and close-knit community care, often taking place outside institutional formalities. It is part of a broader spiritual approach integrating faith, prayer, and healing, aiming to restore wholeness and reclaim individuals from harmful spiritual forces.
In summary, casting out devils in Appalachian Pentecostalism encompasses spiritual deliverance that is biblically rooted but practiced with local cultural adaptations, emphasizing prayer, community involvement, and healing, differing from the formal Catholic exorcism but sharing the goal of overcoming evil through spiritual power.
The thesis “These Signs Shall Follow: Endangered Pentecostal Practices in Appalachia” by Melanie Rae Harsha documents and analyzes a set of Pentecostal and Holiness practices—some common, others regionally endangered—particularly in Appalachian communities.
Troy Day
The description accurately highlights the distinctive nature of spiritual deliverance in Appalachian Pentecostalism, contrasting it with the formalized ritual of Catholic exorcism. In Appalachia, deliverance is deeply rooted in community practice—often decentralized, led by both clergy and laypersons, and contextualized within the region’s ethos of self-reliance and intimate fellowship. Unlike the codified procedures and sacramental elements central to Catholic exorcism, Appalachian Pentecostal deliverance prioritizes direct prayer, spiritual warfare, and holistic healing of the individual—mind, body, and soul.
Significantly, this form of deliverance extends its scope beyond classic demon possession to embrace broader spiritual afflictions, such as generational curses, witchcraft, and occult oppression. This reflects a worldview in which spiritual struggles are intertwined with both personal and communal experience. The process of prayerful intervention, communal support, and faith-driven restoration is deeply woven into Appalachian identity, connecting biblical precedent with local practice.
Melanie Rae Harsha’s thesis, “These Signs Shall Follow: Endangered Pentecostal Practices in Appalachia,” offers a valuable scholarly lens, documenting such deliverance rituals while noting their endangered status in light of changing regional dynamics. Her work positions Appalachian spiritual deliverance not only as a religious act but as an expression of cultural resilience and adaptation, bridging Holiness and Pentecostal traditions with the lived realities of Appalachian communities.
Comment:
The Appalachian Pentecostal understanding of deliverance serves as both spiritual and communal healing. This approach, characterized by informality and adaptability, aligns with a biblically rooted but culturally sensitive theology—a vivid example of how Pentecostalism continues to interact with local traditions, contextually interpreting scriptural mandates to meet the needs of the faithful. The emphasis on prayer, community, and holistic restoration affirms the ongoing relevance of these practices, even as they face challenges from modernization and shifting religious landscapes, as noted in Harsha’s research. @followers @highlight Philip Williams John Mushenhouse Glynn Brown Neil Steven Lawrence
Theron Gunn
Troy Day i differentiate between excorism and deliverance. Excorism is the practice of casting out demons spirits fron non believers. Deliverance is the process of casting off and expelling demonic spirits that oppress or come against the child of God.
Vijay Babu
Troy Day 👍
Balitumye Emmanuel Bosco
Troy Day 👍👍
Robert Borders
Troy Day
Pentecostal Theology
Theron Gunn The question of whether Jesus of Nazareth truly died is not simply a matter of doctrinal affirmation but strikes at the very heart of Christian theology and historical scholarship. For centuries, skeptics and believers alike have debated the circumstances, historical evidence, and theological significance of Jesus’ death. This essay seeks to present a reasoned, evidence-based argument for the historical certainty of Jesus’ death, drawing from biblical records, non-biblical historical sources, medical analysis, and scholarly consensus.
I. The Historical Reality of Jesus’ Death
A substantial majority of contemporary historians—regardless of theological bias—affirm the basic facts of Jesus’ crucifixion. Bart Ehrman, a prominent secular historian, insists that “historians have no difficulty whatsoever speaking about the belief in Jesus’ resurrection, since this is a matter of public record, and it is a historical fact that some of Jesus’ followers came to believe that he had been raised from the dead soon after his execution”. Tacitus, a Roman historian writing around 116 AD, mentions Jesus’ execution under Pontius Pilate during the reign of Tiberius—an independent, non-Christian confirmation of the central event. Similarly, the Jewish historian Josephus, writing about 93–94 AD, references the crucifixion, with most scholars accepting the authenticity of the core passage.
Biblical accounts in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John offer multiple attestation to Jesus’ death by crucifixion (see Matt 27:32-61; Mark 15:33-47; Luke 23:44-56; John 19:28-42), confirming the event from four convergent perspectives. These accounts are further reinforced by St. Paul’s early creed in 1 Corinthians 15:3-5, detailing the death, burial, and resurrection as integral to the faith and establishing their proximity to the event itself for historical credibility.
II. Medical and Archaeological Confirmation
Crucifixion was an execution method reserved for maximum suffering and humiliation in the Roman world. Medical analysis published through NIH observes that victims of crucifixion—Jesus included—commonly died by asphyxiation, cardiac rupture, or cardiorespiratory failure, with Jesus’ rapid death possibly attributed to his severe scourging before being nailed to the cross. Forensic pathologists agree that Jesus’ death fits the archetype with no known exceptions in the historical record.
Archaeological discoveries, such as the ossuary of Jehohanan—a first-century victim of crucifixion—demonstrate the brutal finality of the Roman execution method and its widespread attestation. Specialized studies of Roman burial and crucifixion practices support the biblical detail that Jesus’ body was verifiably removed from the cross and entombed by Joseph of Arimathea, a historically credible account considering his prominence as a Sanhedrin member. The absence of counter-narratives from contemporary opponents further solidifies the event’s authenticity.
III. Eyewitness and Cultural Testimony
The Gospels and other early Christian writings consistently report a public execution, witnessed by a multitude—including both followers and detractors. Lies or manufactured stories of the resurrection, while theoretically possible, would have been unlikely to gain the early traction and risk the credibility of so many eyewitnesses in such hostile, controlled environments.
Non-Christian sources also acknowledge that the followers of Jesus genuinely believed in his death and resurrection—an attestation that had significant public and sociopolitical ramifications. Such convictions were not the product of mythmaking alone but grounded in real, traumatic historical events, evidenced by the transformation of disciples from fearful deserters to bold proclaimers.
IV. Theological Implications
The actual death of Jesus is not merely a historical curiosity but the cornerstone of Christian theology. If Jesus did not truly die, then the resurrection—central to Christian doctrine—would be rendered null. Trinitarian and Oneness debates, referenced in contemporary Pentecostal Theology discussions, hinge upon the reality of Jesus’ death and the resultant theological interpretations of what it means for God to experience mortality.
Paul emphasizes in Romans 5:10 and 1 Corinthians 15, “If Christ has not been raised, our preaching is useless and so is your faith.” The early church’s willingness to embrace even the shame of a crucified Messiah points to the event’s factual nature and its redemptive power.
Conclusion
The cumulative historical, medical, archaeological, and cultural evidence overwhelmingly supports the claim that Jesus of Nazareth genuinely died by crucifixion under Roman authority. From secular historians to biblical scholars and medical experts, the consensus is clear: Jesus’ death is one of the best-attested events in ancient history. Its theological significance remains unparalleled, undergirding the Christian proclamation of resurrection and redemption for all who believe.