Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
| PentecostalTheology.com
I have come across a theological assertion that Philippians 2:6 should be understood thus:
Who, being in the form of a God, thought it not robbery to be
equal with God
What is the hermeneutical justification for adding or not adding the ‘a’ or for understanding an ‘a’ even if it is left out of the translation?
