Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars
| PentecostalTheology.com
70
(Peabody,
Gifts
in the
Early
Church
Ronald A. N.
Kydd,
Charismatic
Mass.: Hendrickson
Publishers, 1984)
100
pp., paper- back. ISBN 091-3573-09-4
Reviewed
by
David
Bundy
Pentecostal
historiography published
81-82).
Both books tradition
presentations: Charismatic, ‘”.Scottish “Origen
and the 111-116.
Kydd
continues a revision
of
of the author’s
doctoral
disser-
30 (1977), 313-318 and
“charismatic
Kydd’s
volume on the
early
church
which has been seen in the
previously
work of
Stanley
M.
Burgess (see
Pneuma 7:1 ( 1985),
reflect a
rejection
of the
history
of heresies
and the identification with the main
body
of Christian historiography.
This volume is a popularisation
tation
presented
for the Ph.D. at the
University
of St. Andrews in Scotland. Two
portions
were
published
earlier in more
scholarly
“Novation’s De
Trinitate,
29: Evidence for the
Journal of Theology
Gifts of the
Spirit,” tglise
et
Théologie
13 ( 1982),
The work reflects the careful
scholarly
work for which Dr.
has become known.
Formerly
a
professor
and dean at Central Pentecostal
College
in
Canada,
the author is
currently pastor
of a church in
Ontario,
Canada.
The method of presentation is to describe the church of the first three centuries as reflected in
patristic
The order of presentation
logical beginning
with the
enigmatic
Didache
(Teaching of
the Twelve
Apostles)
and Clement of Rome
continuing through
of Alexandria and Firmilian. A total of nineteen
of
materials)
above, Ignatius of Antioch, Hermas,
Montanism, Celsus,
Eusebius of
gifts”.
Origen, Dionysius
authors
(or groups addition to those mentioned Justin
Martyr,
Caesarea, Theodotus, the Odes
of Solomon work and
prosopography
of
addressing
texts which allude to
is basically chrono-
are discussed
including,
in
Irenaeus, of
Rome, Tertullian,
Cyprian,
Hippolytus
and the
Apocryphal Acts of the Apostles.
The
each of these writers is fraught with historiographical problems
and
Kydd
does a credible
job
of
these in lay language.
Appended
notes
(pp. 88-100)
are often
quite helpful.
One wishes that the
dialogue
with current scholarly patristic
research had been carried out
there, especially where
Kydd accepts
the standard received
Anglo-Saxon
traditions
for
example,
the Odes
of Solomon, Origin
and
Originism
Montanus. That
aside,
each
vignette
is a nearly self-contained
with
many
well-translated
quotations
from
patristic
about,
and
discussion
texts.
A presentation
address an issue with
implications
of the literature of earlier centuries,
especially
to
is not an
for
contemporary
life,
1
71
easy
task. The work of Dr.
Kydd,
while
admirable,
raises for the reviewer the
question:
What did the
phenomena
described as “charismatic
gifts”
mean for the
early
writers and how did
they function? It would
appear
that for
Hermas, Clement
of Rome and Ignatius
of Antioch
(to
mention the three earliest works
discussed) the charismata were more than
aspects
of
liturgy
and
group (or individual) spirituality. They
were also
metaphors
for social control and functioned to give the Christian associations structures and a means of representing the
group
to the world. Elective and appointive
offices
complicated
the issue
(cf. Actso.
The
Bishops and other officers were considered
appointed by
God. The issue came to a head when the
“pneumatic”
filled with the
Spirit disagreed
with the
Bishop
who was filled with the same
Spirit!
Secondly,
what does the shift in language about
“spiritual gifts” actually
mean for the
community?
Can it not be argued that there was a
continuity
of concerns
by
the
development
of different vocabulary
and
expressions?
One finds in the fourth
century writings of Chrysostom,
the
Cappadocians
and
Cyril
of Jerusalem a careful
rigorous spirituality;
and it was the church of the fourth century
which defined the
functioning
and
divinity
of the
Holy Spirit
and in the centuries which followed their
spiritual
heirs took the Christian
gospel
to the “ends of the earth.” What
sociological, ecclesiological
and
political
realities made the continued use of “gift
filled life”
language
less effective’?
These
questions
are not so much criticisms of Dr.
Kydd’s work as they
are
suggestions
for
profitable
avenues of research. It is hoped that Dr.
Kydd
will continue his
study
of
patristic spirituality.
.
2