The Challenge Of Diversity Chaos Or Community

The Challenge Of Diversity  Chaos Or Community

Click to join the conversation with over 500,000 Pentecostal believers and scholars

| PentecostalTheology.com

1999

PRESIDENTIAL

The

Challenge

Chaos or

Community

Rebecca

.

glimmers

173

ADDRESS

of

Diversity:

Skaggs

We live in a world

poised

on the threshold of a new

century;

not only

a new

century

but a new millennium. There is no

way

to antici- pate fully

what that

means,

but we can

gather

clues from some of the

we have been

getting

in the last few

years. Certainly,

our world as we know it is

clearly changing. Technology

at which we can

only guess.

This is bring-

opportunities -challenges

ing

the

geographical

world closer –

tling,

is

presenting

the

tap

of a button can link one to

is even

possible

to

shop

on experiment

learning

more accessible thing important

-the

community ing

and interaction between

Europe

or Africa or Asia – if you know how to do it. This alone is star-

but there is also the

potential

for isolation. It is easier to sit at home and “discuss”

things

with

people you

never see on the “Net.” It

the

“WEB,”

and education is beginning to

with distance

learning

and non-traditional

tion. All of this

development

is

great

in that it makes education

and more available. But it leaves out some-

The faces of America

educational

and economic

forms of educa-

and

created

by

the

classroom,

the bond-

and

student,

and the

feeling

and similar dreams

Now our world arly

studies show

clearly the

“minority”

professor

among

the students that we are all in this

together.

are also

changing.

There was a time when the

majority

of

people

in North America looked

similar,

had similar

backgrounds,

for the future. Events like the two world wars bonded

people

in a common cause

against

a common

enemy.

is and has been

changing.

that the

past “majority”

as more and more faces take on a

variety

of

colors, shapes

and

styles accompanied by

as many different

languages,

educa-

tional and economic

backgrounds, recent conference on

elementary

Demographic

and schol-

is

quickly becoming

and

ways

of

living

life. At one education,

the

speaker pointed

out

1

174

.

that in some California classrooms there are sometimes as many as fifty different

languages represented. And,

that is not

only

California. The face of America is changing and with it the comfortable

assumption

of life as we have known it.

By

comfortable I mean, it is

always

easier to speak

the same

language

as

everyone,

to have similar

backgrounds,

to have similar

understandings

of

history,

and similar dreams for the future,

similar

perspectives

about life and how the world is.

Furthermore,

I

submit,

that the

challenge

of

diversity

not

only exists within the

spheres

of

ethnicity, culture,

and

language.

The chal- lenge

exists in a more

disconcerting

form within

Christianity

and even within Pentecostalism. We have heard a lot about this

during

this con- ference in

Springfield.

Diversity

in itself is not

inherently good

or

bad;

rather it is some- thing

to which one must

respond:

either it can create a

meaningless multiplicity

of

divisions,

conflict and chaos or it can be embraced to become a rich

tapestry

of

colors,

a mosaic of

images,

a

community

of each

part contributing

to the whole. The

image

I like is a stained

glass window in which

portions

viewed

separately

make

up

a chaos of col- ors but

together they

create a picture.

God seems to have ordained

diversity by

nature itself: consider in nature the

multiplicity

of

colors, styles

of

animals,

kinds and

shapes

of plants,

even insects. The

picture

of Jesus in the

Gospels

is

given

from four

perspectives. Although

some of the material is

similar,

different perspectives

of Jesus are evident. Paul often used the

body

with its many parts

to

explain

the

working

of individuals within the church

– there are different kinds of

gifts,

different kinds of

services,

different kinds of

working (1

Cor.

12:4-6),

even different kinds of

tongues (1 Cor.

12:28).

Diversity

can build the

uniqueness

of each individual into a har- monious

unity

or it can lead to chaos. The Tower of Babel is

perhaps the earliest

example

of how

diversity

can create chaos. God used diver- sity

of

languages

to distract the

people

from their

goal.

In later

times, Israel

experienced

moral

relativity

when

everyone

did what was

right in their own

eyes, ultimately missing

God’s desired level of holiness. The Corinthian

church,

a church full of

gifts,

misused these to create divisions, competition among

the members and

general disunity. So, obviously diversity

can lead to chaos.

God’s

purpose

for

diversity, however,

is different than this.

Perhaps the clearest

example

can be found in Jesus’ own

prayer

in John 17 where Jesus

prays

that the

disciples (and by

extension

us) may

be one as he and the Father are one. Jesus

emphatically prayed “may they

be brought

to

complete unity” (John 17:21).

Merrill C.

Tenney,

the late New Testament scholar and Dean of the Wheaton Graduate

School,

2

175

makes some remarkable

points

about this

concept.

He

says

the

concept can be understood

by analyzing

what

unity is alongside

what it is not.

Unity

is not

zrnanimity. Unanimity

means “absolute concord of opinion

within a group of people.” Nowhere in the Bible does the Lord say

that

everyone

must think

exactly

alike or even

agree

on

every topic. There is

plenty

of room for different

perspectives (like

the

pictures

of Jesus or the different

explanations

of faith and works

by

Paul and James for

example).

These differences

complement

each other. Like the mosaic or stained

glass window, they help

to

complete

the

picture with various hues.

Secondly, unity

is not

zrniformity,

that

is,

“oneness or sameness of organization

or ritual.”

Again, Scripture

does not mandate

things

like the order of

worship

or the exact

way

we

worship. Rather,

it

conveys the

atmosphere

which should

permeate

our services and leaves room for

diversity

of individual

operations. Thirdly, unity

is not union which “implies political

affiliation without

necessarily including

individual agreement.” Belonging

to

something

without

personal

commitment is not what

unity

is about either.

None of these

three-unanimity, uniformity,

or

union-get

at the “heart” of what Jesus means

by unity. Unity

involves

something

dif- ferent than total

agreement,

sameness of

practice

or ritual or

political affiliation. The

key

to Jesus’

concept

of

nature of the

unity

can be found in the

very

Trinity

itself “the oneness of inner heart and essential purpose through

the

possession

of a common interest or a common life” while

I

maintaining

the

uniqueness

of each individual’s

gifts

and functions.

This idea is summarized in 1 Corinthians 12 where Paul talks about diversities of

gifts

but

by

the same

Spirit;

the

many parts

of the

body, but one functioning

body; many individuals,

but one unit. The

key

is the same

Spirit.

The

Holy Spirit

unifies the various

gifts

into one col- orful

mosaic;

all the

parts

into one

functioning body,

the multitude of individuals into one

integrated body

united in

worship

and committed to

fulfilling

God’s will.

This

spiritual unity

has been seen

through

the

ages. Irrespective

of geography, time, space, education, nationality,

Christians have been one in the same

Spirit.

So we can see the links between Paul of Tarsus, St. Thomas

Aquinas

of

Italy,

Luther of

Germany, Wesley

of

England, and

Moody

of America; all are

creating

the mosaic of God’s

kingdom by

the same

Spirit.

I

suggest

that this

sharing

of a common

purpose

to do God’s will and live a holy life in community with

others,

is the nature of unity, and . —-. – -. — —

lMerrill C.

Tenney, Gospel of John (Grand Rapids,

MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Co., 1980),

248.

3

– – – 176

– –

of the

community into the

twenty-first people

were in

understand

should strive as we

go

so power-

work, Christians

for which we as Pentecostals

century.

The church started out that

way.

In Acts 2

Jerusalem from

“every

nation under heaven”

(2:5).

At Pentecost the

Holy Spirit

unified

diversity

into a community

ful that the first church was bom. This

unity

in diversity was the reverse of the chaos of

diversity

at the Tower of Babel when no one could

each other

(Gen. 11). At Pentecost,

of a sudden,

everyone

could understand

guage.” Although, through

the

ages

the

Holy Spirit

has continued

sadly

there has not

always

been

unity

in

diversity.

and even Pentecostals we see divisions and conflict.

At the turn of the

century,

the Azusa Street

experience

experience

of

unity

and

community.

bonded

together “by

by

the

Holy Spirit,

all the

message

“in their own lan-

to

Among

revived the Sources record that there were

as well as women who were

many

diverse ethnic

people represented

the same

Spirit.” Truly,

there was “neither Jew nor Greek,

neither male nor

female;”

all were one in Christ. Within a short time, however,

there was division based on race.

Today,

we

especially as Pentecostals should be united

irrespective

of

racial,

social

status,

in our world.

gender

or ethnic differences.

Right now, community Actually,

quality

Omish

recently

wrote:

is an

important concept

it has been shown to be

significant

to

physical healing

and of life as well as for human survival. On this

theme,

Dr. Dean

likely

People who are lonely, depressed and isolated are three to five times more to

develop serious illnesses or die prematurely than those who have close ties with

friends, relatives and community members.

I’m not aware of any factor in medicine (not diet, not smoking, not exer- cise, not stress, not genetics, not dmgs, not surgery) that has a

on our

greater impact

quality of life, incidence of illness and premature death than the heal- of love and

intimacy. Yet the need for love and intimacy often

unfulfilled.

ing power

only macy among

Intimacy spent people truly

goes When I talk of love’s

impact on our health, I am not referring to love in romantic terms.

Rather, anything that promotes feelings of love, inti-

and community is healing and makes us whole. This can include love

friends and family members and even love for a pet. Love can also be spiritual or religious.

is in increasingly short supply today. In the past, most

their entire lives in the same towns or

people

neighborhoods,

where other

knew them and they knew everyone. Now, many people live in isolation.

Studies suggest that loving and being loved, harmonious communica- tion and physical contact can affect the body in very powerful and positive

ways.

42

Examples: One study of couples who had been married an average of

years

found that those who constantly argued had significantly weaker immune defenses than those who did not fight.

4

simply

177

Researchers saw the same effect with newlyweds. Those who were neg- ative or hostile while discussing problems showed a drop in immune pro- tection during the next 24 hours. The immune protection of harmonious cou- ples In

did not decline.

another amazing demonstration of the power of love, students who

watched a

documentary

about Mother Teresa

serving

the

poor

of Calcutta showed a

significant increase in disease-fighting antibodies.

Love also protects the body by calming the heart, lowering blood pres- sure and reducing the destructive effects of anxiety.

As Dr. Dean Omish

emphasizes,

There is also

says,

“Those of us

innovators,

people.

Debra Learning,” put ter job

of

instilling

justice seeking.”3

waste needed

talent, hostile

groups,

or do by

we need

community

even for our

in education. Dr. Saundra

appreciation

Director

of “Racial

Legacies

and

and

possible?

physical well-being.

a call for

community

Bunce,

Assistant Professor of

Sociology

at Mount St.

Mary’s College

in

higher

education must

actively participate…We need to be cultural

bridge builders, mediators, negotiators, helpful

and

highly

concerned members of a community family. If we choose to remain distant and

aloof,

then we cannot

hope

for recon-

ciliation, greater tolerance,

or intercultural in our

young

The

academy

must do more

Humpheys, Project

it like this:

“Colleges

and Universities need to do a bet-

in students a sense of responsibility not

only

to indi- . vidual achievement and fairness but also to

community-building

I can

add,

this is the work of the church as well.

The

challenge

is clear: we are faced with the wonderful

diversity

of

our world. But do we allow it to cause isolation and

fragmentation,

and

breakup society

into

mutually

envious and

we

respond by helping people

make connections

first

modeling unity among

ourselves and then

building bridges

instead of

widening

chasms? Is

community

Jesus

always

addressed

people

where

they

were and whoever

they

were and

challenged

them to be

transformed,

not

by adopting any one

social standard or cultural

idea,

or even one ecclesiastical

things.

He called them to follow him and then to transform the world

around them

by loving

as he loved. For

example,

when he

spoke

to the

he transcended the

squabbles

about the

place

of

worship

and focused on the

key

issue of transformation

To become instruments to fulfill Christ’s

prayer

to

complete unity

involves several

things

on our

part.

It

involves immersion in the

Scriptures

the vehicle of his love can we ever

hope

to

bridge

Samaritan

woman,

brought

becoming –

way

of doing

by

the

Spirit. that we

may

be

and

knowledge

of God.

Only by

2Racial Legacies and Learning: An .American Dialogue, 13. 3Racial Legacies and Learning: An American Dialogue, 3.

5

178

differences. It involves

listening

to the

many

voices of our

world,

so that we can

help

create a new

language

of

empathy

and

compassion rather than one of divisiveness and

oppression.

It involves a vision which,

as President Brzezinski of the

McGregor

School of Antioch University puts it, “sees diversity

as an asset rather than a liability.”4 It calls for better

listening, thinking

and

talking.

As one

educator,

Anne Leo Ellis

wrote, “First,

we must listen.

Carefully, thoughtfully,

without interruption,

without hidden

agendas,

without

preconceptions. Next, we need to think. And talk. With each other. As

openly

as

possible,

for healing, comprehension, reconciliation-friendship.”5

And most importantly,

as

Pentecostals,

it requires that we live

up

to the wonder- ful

heritage

of our

tradition,

that we

truly

be “one” in the

Holy Spirit.

We as Pentecostals have what is needed to make this transformation a

reality-to

weave the diverse

pieces

into one

glorious

fabric- because we have the

Spirit.

The Spirit allows for

complexity

but blends the

many parts

into one unified

body.

The

Spirit

takes the

complexity of

diversity

often

leading

to

misunderstanding

and divisiveness and turns it into

opportunities

and

possibilities.

The

Spirit

transforms our fragmented

and divided world into one in which

truly

there is no Jew nor

Greek,

no male or

female,

no rich or poor, no national distinctions. The

Spirit

takes chaos and creates

community, unity, oneness,

whole- ness.

By

the

Holy Spirit

we can be united toward the

goal

to be one so that the world will know that Christ was sent to bring love and

redemp- tion for all

people

and all races and cultures.

This

Society

for Pentecostal Studies conference in

Springfield

in March 1999 has moved the discussion on

diversity

in a positive direc- tion

by articulating

issues and

suggesting

models for resolution. Clearly,

we all are

seeking reconciliation, resolution,

and

healing

of divisions

among races, gender, denominations, cultures, theology.

The

question

is where do we

go

from here? As we

approach

the new

century, my hope

as president, is that we will

put

feet on our vision and action to our words. We must not allow our words to drift into silence as we return to our

busy

schedules. We have

agreed

on

many concepts

and issues but we are not

yet

clear what these ideas look like when translated into real-life situations.

As we look forward to the next

millennium, the challenge

is to bring

about a

community

that is unified in

spirit

and at the same time appreciate

the richness of our

unique qualities. Perhaps imagery again conveys

the idea: our

goal

should be

community

constructed like a salad rather than

soup.

Sometimes we use the

figure

of a melting pot to – – .–. — —- n__- —— —

4Racial Legacies and Learning: An American Dialogue, 13.

5Anne Leo Ellis, ed., First We Must Listen: Living in a Multicultural Society (New York,

NY: Friendship Press, 1996), 7.

6

179

describe a blending of differences. The

figure

of a salad is better. In a salad,

each item is

individual, contributing

to the

perfection

of the whole,

each

part ultimately creating

the whole without

losing

its indi- viduality. Soup, however, although

constructed of

many

different ele- ments,

blends the elements to create

something

new and the individu- ality

of the

parts

is lost. Our

challenge

in the

coming years

is to trans- late our ideas about

diversity

into real life contexts. For

example,what will

appreciative worship

sound like when it represents

diversity?

How do we embrace

diversity

and deal with issues such as homosexuals as pastors

or unisex

marriages? Obviously,

this task is not

going

to be easy.

Since the issue itself is so

multi-faceted,

our solution will need to be

complex

and multi-faceted. We will need to hear the

many

voices and

perspectives prayerfully

and

sensitively. May

the

Spirit guide

us and

give

us wisdom!

7

Be first to comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.