meaning

Meaning of γυναικα in 1 Tim 3:11

Meaning of γυναικα in 1 Tim 3:11

I’m looking for commentaries/publications regarding use of word ‘γυναικα’ in 1 Tim 3:11.
I need commentaries, which would cover following concepts:

γυναικα – the wife [of a Deacon]
γυναικα – a woman [in general]
γυναικα – a woman [Deacon]…

The Meaning of Blood Moons and Tetrads :: By Jeff Van Hatten

The Meaning of Blood Moons and Tetrads :: By Jeff Van Hatten

Matthew 24:42 – “Watch therefore: for you know not in what hour Yeshua will come.” Luke 21:25-28 – “There will be signs in sun and moon and stars…. the powers of the heavens will be shaken…. When these things begin to take place, stand up and lift up your heads, for your redemption is near!” […]

The post The Meaning of Blood Moons and Tetrads :: By Jeff Van Hatten appeared first on Rapture Ready.

Meaning of Hebrews 10:33

Meaning of Hebrews 10:33

“But remember the former days, when, after being enlightened, you endured a great conflict of sufferings, partly by being made a public spectacle through reproaches and tribulations, and partly by becoming sharers with those who were so t…

What is the meaning of "water and blood" in 1 John 5:6?

In 1 John 5:6 John uses water and blood as symbolic short hand, clearly expecting his audience to know the meaning of these two liquids.

6 This is the one who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ. He did not
come by water only, but by water and blood. And it is the Spirit who
testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. 7 For there are three that
testify: 8 the Spirit, the water and the blood; and the three are
in agreement. 9 We accept human testimony, but God’s testimony is
greater because it is the testimony of God, which he has given about
his Son.

At its most basic 1 John 5:6 operates as a counter claim to those who hold that Jesus Christ came in water but not in blood. John holds that Jesus Christ came by both water and blood. A counter group appears to believe He came only in water. The structure of this verse as an implicit rebuttal begs the question of what does it refute. What is the meaning of water and blood?