Pentecostal Beliefs on Divorce and Remarriage

Posted by Link Hudson in Facebook's Pentecostal Theology Group View the Original Post

Pentecostal Beliefs on Divorce and Remarriage

I remember growing up, it seemed like Pentecostals were fairly conservative about divorce and remarriage. In the A/G, it seemed unlikely that a divorced and remarried man could be a pastor.

I’ve read some of Seymour’s writings from the time of the Azusa Street Revival. He held to a fairly traditional evangelical view of the subject.

I’ve been surprised in recent years at how common it is for Pentecostal denominations to ordain people who have been divorced and remarried, even if it may not have been the other party’s fault. I’m even more surprised at how common and how accepted divorce and remarriage is in a lot of churches.

I realize God redeems people. Jesus came to call, not the righteous, but sinners to repentance. And of course, there are victims of divorce, especially in an age of no-fault divorce where, in a lot of states, your partner can legally divorce you for no real reason at all.

So I’d like to start a discussion of the topic. Mainly, I’d like to discuss these issues:

1. How can we prevent divorce and remarriage?

How can we train the youth and young adults to think Biblically about these issues when their parents and society hasn’t always given them the best examples of marital faithfulness? How can we teach them to choose spouses wisely? What type of preventative measures can be taken on this front.

2. What role can church discipline, especially the first steps where you correct individually without taking it before the church, play in preventing divorce?

It seems to me that US Pentecostalism largely ignores scripture on church discipline and doesn’t put it into practice these days. Leaven is allowed to remain and not purged in a lot of cases. When church discipline is exercised, it is often according to denominational rules rather than scripture, people in extra-biblical hiearchical positions handling matters behind closed doors rather than the matter being taken before the church as scripture teaches, for example.

3. How can we help bring healing to the victims and restoration to the perpetrators without endorsing or encouraging sin?

4. Is this topic too sensitive and too widespread for preachers to be willing to preach on it?

It seems rare that the topic is addressed, that Jesus’ words about adultery in Matthew 19 are actually taught, for example. I believe there are plenty of pew-sitting Pentecostals who don’t study their Bible enough on their own who are willing to divorce and get remarried if their marriage is unpleasant, partly because they haven’t heard from the pulpit that it’s a sin to do so, and partly because of the example of others.

Ricky Grimsley [03/16/2016 9:13 AM]
We owe it to teach people the truth no matter how difficult. We cant water down God’s word because the culture doesnt like it.

Link Hudson [03/16/2016 9:16 AM]
I suspect a lot of the adulterous divorce and remarriage happens because those who are supposed to be shepherding the flock don’t tell them the word of God on the issue. Then divorce and remarriage becomes the norm. The example reinforces other divorces and remarriages. Now, we have a number of leaders who have been adulterously divorced and remarried, too. So they feel guilty preaching against it.

Ricky Grimsley [03/16/2016 9:22 AM]
I agree. I was called a judgmental jerk on this forum for suggesting that todd bentley should not be restored since he was in an adulterous marriage imo.

Amanda Walker [03/16/2016 9:57 AM]
I think when someone in ministry divorces, they should take some time off to heal and be restored. If we truly believe that our sin is forgiven as far as the east is from the west, anyone’s sin, no matter what should be forgiven. I still believe strongly, that rehabilitation after divorce is key. Prevention of divorce is difficult but not impossible. Ministers do not utilize counseling service enough and are often used too late.

Timothy Nail [03/16/2016 10:07 AM]
Traditionally In the church divorce is the one crime against God where the victim and villain are treated exactly the same. I went through this horrible experience where my life was gutted. I did not even date until she remarried and would have never filled for divorce no more than I would have committed suicide. I lived in Florida and had no way to stop the divorce. I would have taken her back even in her state of adultery but she wanted nothing to do with me or ministry. Five years later I married a lady who had never been married and we now have 3 children. I did not cheat but was cheated on and just this week was denied a place to speak even though I am pastor of the leading church in my area and serve as the head of the District. Yes we need to have this conversation and we need to make sure we hold tight to the Biblical principle but we also need to recognize that in most cases there is a victim and a villain when it comes to divorce and make certain we do not apply the same penalty to both.

Stan Wayne [03/16/2016 10:08 AM]
I agree it is a good subject but needs to be broken up into subjects sections or it is too huge.

For example : if a person was married years before conversion and divorced years before conversion – say, married at 18 divorced at 20, remarried at 23 born again at 25. He now has kids.

What is the applicable scripture?

Timothy Nail [03/16/2016 10:09 AM]
Old things have passed away and all things have become new.

Carl Murphy [03/16/2016 10:12 AM]
I think the innocent party rule in the AG is basically a cop out. I do not believe there are that many innocent spouses out there. One party may not have become alcoholic or engage in sex outside marriage but usually there is a reason people self medicate, a reason why the term drive them to drink etc is used. As Solomon said better to dwell in the corner of a roof top than in a wide house with a brawling woman, not to say the show could not be on the other foot. I believe what happened is simply politics with the divorce issue,?someone’s son or daughter got divorced and Daddy or mama had plans for them to follow them into the pulpit they used their influence to change the rules. Divorce is divorce, either accept all who have repented of their part in it or none. This is my opinion, I have never held anything other than Christian Workers Papers in the AG and left the denomination long before the divorce issue was raised, so I don’t have a dog in the fight. But I have friends that felt they were not treated equally because a former spouse would not accept the blame. Now I ask you, whose wife will she be in the resurrection

Stan Wayne [03/16/2016 10:12 AM]
That is what I think.

Now – let’s add the concept of backsliding – we are Arminians.

This similar person starts out saved but backslides at 21 and comes back to the lord at 25.

What then?

Carl Murphy [03/16/2016 10:13 AM]
Sorry Stan but divorce is unpardonable in the AG without a friend in high places

Stan Wayne [03/16/2016 10:16 AM]
I know – they let you back in now though – George Wood has changed everything

Carl Murphy [03/16/2016 10:17 AM]
The whole of the AG has changed, that is why I choose not to be a part of it.

Robert Cox [03/16/2016 10:18 AM]
You sure you want to open this can of worms? I have a personal story about remarriage and the AG. They tried to take our church when I got remarried even tho I wasn’t saved when I was divorced.

Brody Pope [03/16/2016 10:20 AM]
Just gotta keep it biblical. Divorce is a sin without just cause. And Jesus said that fornication and adultery are the only grounds.

Brian Roden [03/16/2016 10:22 AM]
Brody Pope, your last statment seems self-contradictory. First you say there is no just cause, then you state the valid grounds given by Christ. Please clarify.

Robert Cox [03/16/2016 10:28 AM]
I was living in sin! Lol

When I came to the Lord, He forgave me sin. All of it.

Ricky Grimsley [03/16/2016 11:02 AM]
If you leave your spouse (unless they cheated)and marry someone else, thats adultery. If you were already saved and knew better, how can you ask God to forgive you for what you did on purpose and are continuing to do. That doesnt sound like repentance.

Robert Cox [03/16/2016 11:10 AM]
You sound like you’d be good AG material

First off, there was infidelity in the marriage. Secondly, neither of us were saved. Thirdly, what God has forgiven man can’t condemn. But take the high road. You’re in a lot of Pharisitical company.

Ricky Grimsley [03/16/2016 11:34 AM]
I wasnt being hypocritical? I said “if you were saved and knew better”. Obviously god saves and justifies people when they first come to him. But ministers that know better….they are guilty. My position is extreme for everyone i personally know, but they dont have any biblical argument. I have a minister friend that stayed with his wife and wooed her back from another minister she had planned to leave her husband for and marry. He suffered a great deal and so has she but i believe they stopped a situation that would have led people to hell.

TJ Tipton [03/16/2016 11:46 AM]
God divorced Israel, divorce is the problem not the remarriage. I being a divorced minister and remarried never looked back. If you want to take an unscriptural and cultural view of divorce that’s fine but there are cases where divorce and remarriage is alright inspite of what AG says. What do you expect from a denomination that doesn’t support the five fold.

Ricky Grimsley [03/16/2016 11:51 AM]
I havent heard anyone on here that said that there are no grounds for divorce and remarriage. Those circumstances are pretty narrow though.

John Conger [03/16/2016 1:33 PM]
So are you saying remarriage is never considered adultery??

TJ Tipton [03/16/2016 1:36 PM]
Jesus said it wasn’t if the spouse was unfaithful

TJ Tipton [03/16/2016 1:37 PM]
Paul said if the unbeliever left

John Conger [03/16/2016 1:40 PM]
Don’t e all agree that if the spouse was unfaithful remarriage is acceptable. The question is other scenarios

4 Comments

  • Reply May 21, 2016

    Shari Anderson

    Shari Anderson liked this on Facebook.

  • Reply July 7, 2016

    Mary Ellen Nissley

    I was raised in the conservative Mennonite church. Their view of the old testament law is that since Christ fulfilled the law, we don’t go by the OT anymore! We go by the New instead!

    Problem is, this interpretive rule, if applied consistently, turns an OT abomination into a NT command.

    You see, if you apply the idea that everything Christ said about divorce and remarriage is a new law, supplanting the old, then you will tell some couples to divorce their current partners, and go back to their former ones.

    Which Deut 24:1-4 says is an abomination before God.

    Jesus said he did not come to destroy the Law. Not one jot or one tittle will in any wise pass away, until heaven and earth pass away.

    Those parts of the Law which were ceremonial, such as sacrifices, are fulfilled. They are not done away.

    But fulfilling the law doesn’t do away with God’s standard of holy living. What was once an abomination is still an abomination.

    Because God’s nature–his holiness– doesn’t change.

  • Reply November 4, 2016

    eouohsgq

    ESSUA8 eexopkhwuszs, [url=http://nuuhqgsvxrad.com/]nuuhqgsvxrad[/url], [link=http://wknvtgejfvoh.com/]wknvtgejfvoh[/link], http://lsyxxkluqleg.com/

  • Reply September 15, 2018

    Jay

    Matthew was written to the first christians who were hebrews/Jews. Matt 5 & Matt 19 is not dealing with a certified marriage under gentile laws but an espousal custom of jewish marriage. This is why in Matt 1 Joseph thought to put mary away. The applicable jewish law gave him that right before the sexual union on wedding night. Saving for the cause of fornication in Matthews gospel is only NT book using this wording in the greek. In Mark Jesus said a woman could put her husband away but if she remarried she was living in adultery. The gospel of Matthew gives us the genealogy of Christ and Christ uses the kingdom of heaven teaching when the other gospels use The kingdom of God. Jesus plainly says whosoever divorces his wife and marries another practices adultery and if anyone marries her that is put away practices adultery. In 1 Cor 7:10 / If the wife depart from her husband let her remain unmarried and in Rom 7 / 1 Cor The wife is bound by God’s marital law to her husband. So if there was a innocent party seeing she is still bound to him and what God has joined together let no man put asunder. She and him are bound to death. The greek wording is fastened tightly and not easily broken. Any preacher or church leader who has voted over the years to allow such heresy and apostasy will stand before God one day and that preacher thankfully wont be me.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.