Should I Join a Home Church?
5 Reasons You Need to Join a House Church
1. FOR ASSURANCE 2. TO EVANGELIZE THE WORLD. 3. TO EXPOSE FALSE GOSPELS. 4. TO EDIFY THE CHURCH. 5. TO GLORIFY GOD
5 Reasons Why You Should Not Join a House Church 1. It’s so much easier. 2. It’s less “judgmental.” 3. It’s closer to New Testament Christianity. 4. It’s less expensive. 5. You just “click” better with the people at a house church you tried.
John Kissinger [02/02/2016 8:47 AM]
that’s a good question – what do you think about House churches?
Roger David [02/02/2016 10:40 AM]
I love house churches. They are a tighter knit community where you can serve more effectively…evangelize more effectively and build each other up more effectively than you can in a larger church.
Less cracks to slip through…more personalized attention if there is a need that arises. You can spend more time ministering and being ministered to than you can in a larger church.
The only concern I have about house churches is the accuracy of the teaching and the possibility of turning into a little cult.(I’ve seen it happen)
John Kissinger [02/02/2016 1:14 PM]
They are UN-biblical
Roger David [02/02/2016 3:41 PM]
Depends on the size of the house I guess. :p
Vlad Stepanov [02/02/2016 8:19 PM]
That’s a no no.
“Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching.”
Roger David [02/02/2016 8:23 PM]
House churches is assembling together.
John Ruffle [02/03/2016 2:59 AM]
The building block of the Church universal is the house church, aka the family: the ‘church in the home’.
House churches, however, seem to mimic the values that should be in – and remain within – the family. It’s the relationship dynamic that draws the lucky few into so-called house churches. I find them inturned and with an air of exclusivity that’s hard to break into and also usually led quite dictatorially.
However the DYNAMIC of small groups is vital for discipleship and also the seed-bed for revival. Small groups that work and that are sustainable in my experience in USA and England are made up of people who have a commitment to a larger congregation – often crossing denominational divides. This is the direction I do believe we MUST develop more and more.
But autonomous, totally non-accountable groups that stand against established churches – such house “churches”? No. Definitely not.
John Ruffle [02/03/2016 3:13 AM]
PS: The OP and its link are both confusing and not thought through. But the issue is a relevant one. I think the MOTIVE behind any house church vision is important. If it’s based on a dissatisfaction on what the “other” churches are doing then it’s the wrong foundation and ultimately cannot avoid sectarianism and is doomed to fail over time.
John Kissinger [02/03/2016 6:27 AM]
OP presents 2 sides of one very controversial issue for the church today. Did the house church movement intend DEATH OF DENOMINATIONS? http://www.pentecostaltheology.com/death-of-denominations-are-denominations-biblical/